Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:47

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max: The Best View Yet Of New Design Just Leaked - Forbes
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
1st measles case of the year in South Dakota as CDC updates travel guidance - ABC News
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
China extracts critical mineral rubidium from brine for first time - South China Morning Post
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Consequuntur dolor explicabo ipsa autem vel eos et.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
27 Celebrities Before And After Getting Cosmetic Work Done - BuzzFeed
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How can I use AI to create custom music to accompany my vocal song or poetry?